Sequence of Reviews—Reappointment to Probationary or Contract Terms

.087        Reviews of Faculty for the purpose of recommending reappointment without continuous tenure are conducted at the level of the School. If the School is departmentalized, a review by the Department is also required.

.088        Reviews for reappointment are scheduled so as to meet the requirements for notice of non-renewal, as set forth above (B-1.024-026). Accordingly, such reviews are conducted and concluded during the year prior to the last year of appointment then in force, except that (a) in the case of the first appointment to a single-year term, the review is conducted as soon as possible after the first semester of service and (b) in the case of an appointee whose current term extends through the second year of service, the review is conducted during the first semester of the second year.

.089        In a non-departmentalized School, the review for reappointment is initiated by the Dean who submits the case to the CAP of the School. The results of the deliberation and the vote of the CAP are then presented to the Tenured Senior Faculty of the School. This vote constitutes the final recommendation of the School on the reappointment.

.090        In a departmentalized School, the review for reappointment is initiated by the Chair of the cognizant Department who submits the case to the Tenured Senior Faculty of the Department.  The results of the deliberation and the vote of the Department are then presented to the CAP of the School.  The vote of the CAP constitutes the final recommendation of the School on the reappointment.

.091        The recommendation of the School is transmitted to the Provost.  If the recommendation is positive, the Provost forwards it to the President for approval. If the recommendation is negative, the Provost notifies the candidate of the decision.